I Read 2,244 Google Reviews of 122 Property Management Companies. More Than Four in Ten Had Someone Who Couldn't Reach Them.
I sell a 24/7 answering service for property management companies. That gives me an obvious interest in missed calls being a real problem.
Which is exactly why I measured it instead of asserting it — and why the method is published here along with the result, including the parts that weaken it.
How this was done
The sample: 122 property management companies across six U.S. cities — Atlanta, Charlotte, Nashville, Baton Rouge, Fresno and Richmond. All currently trading, all with a public Google Business Profile.
The data: up to 20 Google reviews per company, sorted lowest rating first. 2,244 reviews in total. No reviewer names were collected.
The question: not "was the rent too high" and not "was the deposit returned." One thing only — did a resident or a prospective resident say, in their own words, that they could not reach the company by phone?
The check: every review that matched was read by hand before it was counted, and a fixed exclusion list removed the phrases that look like a missed call but describe something else.
What 2,244 reviews actually said
Of the 2,244 reviews, 2,064 had written text. Of those, 1,241 were one, two or three stars.
One hundred and eleven of those reviews said plainly that the person called and nobody answered, or called and nobody called back.
| What was measured | Result |
|---|---|
| Companies in the sample | 122 |
| Cities | 6 |
| Google reviews collected | 2,244 |
| Reviews with written text | 2,064 |
| Reviews of 1–3 stars | 1,241 |
| Reviews saying the company could not be reached | 111 |
| Companies with at least one such review | 54 of 122 — more than 4 in 10 |
| Companies where it was written in the last 18 months | 22 of 122 — about 1 in 6 |
That review is sitting on their Google Business Profile right now, where the next prospective resident — and the next owner shopping for a management company — reads it before deciding who to call.
This is not a story about bad companies
Before anyone dismisses this as a sample of cowboys: the 122 companies in it hold 32,226 public Google reviews between them, and their average rating is 4.27 stars.
These are, by the only public measure available, normal businesses that are mostly doing a decent job.
A 4.3-star company with a review that says nobody picked up the phone is the ordinary case, not the exception.
That is the part I did not expect. I assumed the missed-call complaint would cluster in the low-rated companies. It does not. It sits alongside the good reviews.
Nearly double what we found in the trades
We ran the same test in September on 59 home-service companies — plumbing, HVAC and related trades — in one U.S. city. There, 14 of 59 had such a review. About one in four. The full write-up is here.
| Home-service companies | Property management | |
|---|---|---|
| Companies | 59 | 122 |
| Reviews read | 1,172 | 2,244 |
| With a "couldn't reach them" review | 14 of 59 — 24% | 54 of 122 — 44% |
I want to be careful about how far that comparison is pushed. The two samples are not matched: the home-service study covered one city and this one covers six, and property management companies carry far more reviews each, which changes what twenty reviews reaches. It is a strong signal. It is not a controlled experiment.
City by city
The rate was not uniform. It ranged from about a quarter of the companies to about two thirds.
| City | Companies | With such a review |
|---|---|---|
| Atlanta | 18 | 12 — 67% |
| Richmond | 17 | 9 — 53% |
| Fresno | 18 | 9 — 50% |
| Charlotte | 18 | 8 — 44% |
| Baton Rouge | 32 | 11 — 34% |
| Nashville | 19 | 5 — 26% |
With fewer than twenty companies in most cities, I would not build a strategy on any single row. The spread is worth showing because it is real, not because it is conclusive.
What the reviews sound like
Four examples, all written in the last twelve months, all from one, two or three-star reviews. I have not named the companies — the point is the pattern, not a pile-on.
"I called three times over the course of a week but I received radio silence and never received a call back."
"They don't answer their phones, so you're left with leaving a message in a black hole."
"I've reached out multiple times through calls and messages, only to be sent to voicemail or receive no response at all."
"Saw a property on Zillow, reached out to this group multiple times with no response for a tour or an application."
Read that last one again. That is not an unhappy resident. That is a person who wanted to rent a unit, tried more than once, and gave up — and the vacancy that followed showed up in the owner's monthly statement with no explanation attached to it.
Why a missed call costs a property manager twice
In the trades, a missed call is a missed job. In property management, the same unanswered phone produces two different losses, and they land on two different people.
The leasing call is revenue. Someone saw the listing and called. If nobody answers, they call the next listing — and the unit sits empty longer. The owner sees days-on-market, not a missed call.
The resident call is cost and liability. Water coming through a ceiling at eleven at night does not pause until the office opens. Every hour it sits in a voicemail box, the repair bill and the exposure grow.
And then there is the third cost, which is the one this study actually measured:
Your residents write the reviews. The owners deciding who manages their buildings read them.
A management company's reputation is written by the people who live in the buildings and read by the people who own them. That is an unusual arrangement, and it makes an "I could never get anyone on the phone" review expensive in a way it simply is not for a plumber.
What this study cannot tell you
The limits matter more than the headline, so here they are plainly.
I counted reviews. I did not count missed calls. No tool can tell you from the outside how many calls a business misses — that number lives in their phone system, not on the internet. Anyone who quotes you a dollar figure for a missed call invented it.
Four in ten is a floor, not a ceiling. Each company's twenty lowest-rated reviews were read. For 47 of the 122, that was not deep enough to reach the end of their complaints — the collection hit the limit while still inside their negative reviews. Had it gone deeper, some of those 47 would likely have joined the 54. None would have left it.
Six cities is not the country. The method was chosen to match an earlier study; the cities were not chosen to represent the United States.
The quiet ones are invisible. The number of people who called, heard voicemail, and simply dialled the next management company is unknowable — and obviously far larger than the number who wrote a review.
Two patterns behind most of it
The clock. Leasing enquiries arrive in the evening, because that is when people look at listings. Emergencies arrive at night, because pipes do not check the time. Both fall outside the hours most management offices staff, and staffing them properly is not one receptionist — it is several.
The language. A resident who reaches an English-only voicemail usually does not leave a message. In a portfolio with Spanish-speaking residents that is not a courtesy question, it is a maintenance-reporting question: the problems you do not hear about are the ones that get expensive. We made that case separately in why English and Spanish is no longer optional.
Neither pattern is solved by working harder. Both are solved by somebody — or something — picking up.
Three things you can check this week, for free
No purchase required, and none of these involve us:
- Read your own one-star reviews and sort them by type. How many are about reaching you, versus about the work, the fees or the deposit? That ratio tells you whether you have a service problem or an access problem. They have completely different fixes.
- Call your own office line at eight in the evening, from a phone your team does not recognise, once as a prospective resident and once as a resident with an emergency. Listen to what each of them hears. Many owners have never done this.
- Find out what happens to the second caller. In most small setups, while one line is busy the next caller gets a busy signal or a voicemail box nobody checks until morning. Ask your phone provider what actually happens — it is usually worse than you assume.
Run it yourself
This is 122 companies in six cities, read once, by one method. It is not the whole industry. Everything needed to repeat it is described above, and if somebody runs the same test in another market and gets a different answer, I want to know about it.
But if you manage property and the phone is where both your leases and your emergencies arrive, it costs you nothing to read your own reviews tonight and see which kind you have.
Hear it for yourself
Maya answers your questions on pricing, setup and getting started — and you hear the product itself while she does. In English or Spanish.
📞 Talk to Maya — (786) 952-4321Prefer we call you?
Leave your details and we'll call you back — no pressure, no obligation.
Questions about this study
How many property management companies have a review saying nobody answered the phone?
In this sample of 122 property management companies across six U.S. cities, 54 of them — more than four in ten — had at least one public Google review in which a resident or a prospective resident said they called and nobody answered, or called and nobody called back. For 22 of the 122, that review was written within the last 18 months.
Is that worse than other industries?
In our earlier study, run with the same method on 59 home-service companies — plumbing, HVAC and related trades — it was 14 of 59, about one in four. Among property management companies it was 54 of 122, more than four in ten. The two samples are not identical, so this is a strong signal rather than a controlled comparison: the home-service sample was one city and this one is six, and the property management companies hold far more reviews each.
Does this measure how many calls a business misses?
No, and it should not be read that way. This study counted public reviews, not calls. No tool can tell you from the outside how many calls a business misses — that data lives in the company's phone system. What the study measures is how often somebody was annoyed enough about not reaching a management company to write about it in public.
How were the reviews collected?
122 property management companies were selected across Atlanta, Charlotte, Nashville, Baton Rouge, Fresno and Richmond: currently trading, with a public Google Business Profile. Up to 20 reviews per company were collected from Google, sorted lowest rating first, for a total of 2,244 reviews. Reviews of three stars or fewer were then matched against a fixed list of phrases describing not being able to reach the business, and every match was read by hand before being counted. No reviewer names were collected.
Why does a missed call matter more for a property manager than for a contractor?
Because two different losses sit on the same phone line. A leasing enquiry that goes unanswered leaves a unit vacant for longer, and the owner sees the vacancy rather than the missed call. A resident emergency that goes unanswered turns into more damage and more liability. And the review that follows is written by a resident but read by the owners deciding who manages their buildings next year.